BUY OR RENT | WATCH ON AMAZON PRIME

Context of The Human Scale

Directed by Andreas Dalsgaard, The Human Scale (2012) is a thought-provoking documentary that explores how urban design impacts human behavior, health, and community. Inspired by the work of Danish architect and urban planner Jan Gehl, the film examines how modern cities prioritize cars, infrastructure, and economic growth over the needs of people.

Jan Gehl’s philosophy, developed through decades of research, advocates for rethinking urban environments to focus on human scale and interaction. Gehl and his team emphasize creating pedestrian-friendly spaces that encourage walking, cycling, and social engagement, countering the alienating effects of car-centric design. The film visits cities around the globe—including Copenhagen, New York, Dhaka, Christchurch, and Chongqing—to analyze their successes and failures in adopting human-centered urban planning.

The Human Scale was released at a time when rapid urbanization and climate change were pressing global issues, making its call for sustainable, people-oriented cities particularly timely. The film blends expert commentary, real-world case studies, and evocative imagery to challenge conventional approaches to urban development.


Critics of The Human Scale

  1. Idealism vs. Realism
    While many praised the film’s vision of people-centered urban planning, some critics argued that it oversimplified complex urban challenges. Critics noted that cultural, economic, and political factors are often significant barriers to implementing such changes, and the film glossed over these difficulties.
  2. Limited Depth in Analysis
    Some reviewers felt the documentary focused too heavily on Jan Gehl’s philosophy without offering a balanced critique or engaging with opposing viewpoints. The film’s emphasis on Gehl’s successes gave the impression of advocacy rather than a neutral exploration of urban design theories.
  3. Overemphasis on Aesthetic Solutions
    The documentary’s focus on aesthetics and the design of public spaces led some critics to question its engagement with deeper systemic issues, such as affordable housing, social inequality, and governance, which also play crucial roles in urban life.
  4. Repetitive Structure
    The episodic nature of the film, moving from city to city, was seen by some as repetitive. Critics noted that while the global perspective was valuable, the narrative could have benefited from a more cohesive storyline or deeper exploration of fewer case studies.

Cultural and Artistic Impact

Despite these critiques, The Human Scale has been widely lauded for its ability to make urban design accessible and engaging for a broad audience. The film’s emphasis on sustainable and people-friendly urban planning has inspired discussions among architects, planners, policymakers, and the general public.

The film’s visual storytelling—contrasting bustling streets filled with people against barren, car-dominated urban spaces—effectively communicates its central message. Its global scope highlights both the universality of urban challenges and the diversity of approaches to addressing them.

Ultimately, The Human Scale serves as a call to action for rethinking how we build and live in cities. It invites viewers to imagine urban spaces where human connection and well-being take precedence over traffic and congestion. While it may lean toward advocacy, its hopeful and visionary perspective has resonated with audiences, making it a significant contribution to the ongoing conversation about the future of cities.

The Human Scale | February 21, 2013 (Denmark) 7.2

Videos


See all videos >>

Cast

...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self
...
Self

See full cast >>

Countries: Denmark, Bangladesh, China, New Zealand, United StatesLanguages: EnglishBudget: $780,000 (estimated)